The Golden Isles church of Christ

Weekly Bulletin

Volume 3, Number 1

January 5, 2003

False Standards of Authority - Part 1

by Mike Johnson

Why is there so much division and confusion today in the religious world, so many different doctrines and so many religious groups? One reason is that so many have never been taught, or at least have never learned, the importance of Bible authority. Some may acknowledge that we are to be guided by the Bible, but when all is said and done, they really only pay "lip service" to Bible authority. When man is not following the same standard (God's Word), division and confusion is a certainty.

All authority rests in three areas. There is internal human authority, external human authority, and divine authority. It is clear that God intends for us to be governed by divine authority (Col. 3:17, I Thess. 2:13). Divine authority originates with God, is centered in Christ, and is recorded and revealed in the Bible. Yet, many are governed by external and/or internal human authority. These are incorrect standards, and they need to be exposed as such. Consider some external and internal sources of human authority commonly used today.


Many have followed their "feelings" as a guide in religion. As long as there is the feeling that they are saved, they are satisfied. If one begins to question them about their salvation, one touches a tender spot because their feelings are often "sacred." They may say as they pat their chest, "I would not give up this feeling which I have in my heart for all of the Bibles in the world." Many people would rather die trusting their feelings instead of making a candid and honest investigation of their salvation in view of what the Bible says.

In secular matters, we know that our feelings can deceive us. For example, we may feel that something is true and later learn that it is not. Also, a person may think that he is in good health just prior to the time that he suddenly dies.

Consider two Biblical examples. Jacob, in Genesis 37, was deceived into thinking that his son, Joseph, was dead. Jacob mourned as if Joseph had actually died. He might have said with complete sincerity, "I know how I feel." Saul, later known as Paul, felt that it was his duty to persecute Christians. Later he said (Acts 26:9), "I verily thought with myself that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth." Paul was laboring under a delusion. The fact that he felt that he was doing right did not make his actions right.

There are various Old Testament passages which show the futility of trusting our feelings as a guide for what is right and wrong in serving God. Jeremiah 10:23 says, "O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 17:9 teaches, "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" One cannot depend on his own heart to lead him in the right way. Finally, Proverbs 28:28 says, "He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered." It is certainly foolish for one to trust his feelings concerning his salvation.

Consider religious people (such as the Jews and Muslims) who do not believe that Christ is the son of God. Are they saved? They, no doubt, feel that they are. Yet in John 8:24 Jesus said, "... for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins." These people may feel that they are saved, but that does not mean that they are. If feelings are not evidence of salvation for Jews and Muslims, then they are not evidence of salvation for Methodists, Baptists, and Pentecostals.

How can we have assurance about salvation or anything else that we might believe? (Our feelings can be fickle: one day we might believe one thing; another day we might believe something else.) God's Word give us assurance. It is our safe and steady standard. I John 5:13 says, "These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God." John also wrote (2:3), "And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments." It does not matter how we "feel" about our salvation. God's Word is that which is important in this matter. Can we determine from the Scriptures that we have obeyed the Lord? It does not matter how we feel; what matters is what God says. "Feelings" are produced by evidence; they are not the evidence of salvation.


Others use their conscience as their standard of authority. They might say, "Just let your conscience be your guide." This, however, cannot be a correct standard as it is possible for a person to have a good conscience and yet be in sin. Some can steal and kill with a good conscience.

Consider the case of Paul. Paul, previous to his conversion, was a persecutor of Christians. We are told that during this time he had a good conscience. In Acts 23:1, he said, "...I have lived in all good conscience before God until this day." As we noted earlier, according to Acts 26:9, he said, "I verily thought with myself, that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth." Paul was following his conscience, but he was wrong.

If "conscience alone" is the correct standard, then there are as many standards as there are people. A conscience may be programmed incorrectly, and thus a person could have a good conscience and still be in sin. Surely, the conscience, by itself, is not a correct standard of authority. A conscience must be properly programmed according to God's Word.

How Much "Good" That Something Does

Some people try and justify a practice by how much good is being done. If they are asked for the authority for a certain practice that their church is involved in, they respond by citing the good that is being accomplished. This view is basically saying that the "ends justifies the means." They look at the good that they think is being accomplished and assume that since "good" has been achieved, God must approve of what they have done to achieve this good. This view attributes to God the feelings that man has about matters, rather than looking to God's Word as the authority.

Consider a few Old Testament events. Saul, a king of Israel, was to utterly destroy the Amalekites (I Sam. 15). Saul did not do this; instead he spared their king (Agag) and the best of the animals. When questioned by Samuel, Saul said, "for the people spared the best of the sheep and of the oxen to sacrifice unto the Lord their God." Samuel rebuked him and told him that to obey is better than sacrifice (22). Saul was saying that the ends justifies the means and that it was proper to disobey if good resulted. Saul was wrong and was not justified in his disobedience no matter how much "good" was said to be accomplished. Another example concerns Uzzah (II Sam. 6). The ark of the covenant was being transported upon an ox cart during the reign of David. To begin with, the ark was not being transported correctly. Then, when the ark arrived at Nachon's threshing floor, the ark oxen shook the ark, and it was in danger of falling. Uzzah touched the ark to steady it, which was a violation of God's command. He was immediately killed by God. Uzzah might have contended that his steadying the ark prevented it from crashing to the ground and that good would come because of his disobedience. Uzzah was wrong, however, for touching the ark; he paid for it with his life; the ends did not justify the means.

Instead of trying to justify a practice by pointing out the good that it does, we need to turn to a "thus saith the Lord."

Belief of Parents

There are others whose parents are their sources of authority in religious matters. These will not accept the truth on certain subjects because their parents did not believe that way. Surely this is a wrong source of authority. We must always honor our parents; however, it is possible that they may have been wrong in their beliefs and practices. We must not reject truth simply because it is contrary to what our parents believed. Matthew 10:37 says, "He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me...." (Continued in next week’s issue)

Click here to go to previous week's BULLETIN

Click here to go to next week's BULLETIN

Email the Editor at